The compact SUV segment is brimming with contenders, and two popular choices are the newly refreshed Nissan Juke and the ever-stylish Ford Puma. Both offer bold designs, practical features, and competitive pricing, but which one reigns supreme? Buckle up as we delve into a detailed comparison of these urban warriors, analyzing their design, space, features, specifications, mileage, and price across Europe and the UK.
Design Duel:
- Nissan Juke: The Juke embraces audaciousness with its “frog-face” grille, sharp angles, and bold color options. It turns heads, but not everyone loves its unconventional look.
- Ford Puma: The Puma channels athleticism with its sleek lines, sporty stance, and hidden rear door handles. It offers a more mature yet dynamic design, appealing to a wider audience.
Space Showdown:
- Nissan Juke: Offers decent headroom and legroom in the front, but rear passenger space feels cramped, especially for taller individuals. Trunk capacity stands at 422 liters with the seats up and expands to 1,139 liters when folded.
- Ford Puma: Provides more generous headroom and legroom throughout, making it more comfortable for families. The innovative “MegaBox” under the cargo floor offers additional 80-liter storage, and the boot boasts 401 liters, expanding to 824 liters with folded seats.
Feature Face-Off:
- Nissan Juke: Standard features include touchscreen infotainment, LED headlights, and safety systems like lane departure warning and automatic emergency braking. Higher trims offer navigation, heated seats, and a panoramic sunroof.
- Ford Puma: Comes standard with an infotainment system, cruise control, lane departure warning, and autonomous emergency braking. Higher trims add navigation, a premium sound system, and parking sensors. The Puma also boasts unique features like a heated steering wheel and massage seats.
Specification Scramble:
- Nissan Juke: Available with a 1.0-liter turbocharged petrol engine (114 hp) or a 1.6-liter petrol engine (188 hp, only available with all-wheel drive). Fuel economy ranges from 47.1 mpg to 50.4 mpg (WLTP combined).
- Ford Puma: Powered by a 1.0-liter turbocharged EcoBoost petrol engine in three power outputs (95 hp, 125 hp, or 155 hp). Fuel economy ranges from 46.3 mpg to 51.4 mpg (WLTP combined). The Puma ST performance variant boasts a 200 hp engine, but fuel economy dips to 35.3 mpg (WLTP combined).
New Nissan Juke vs. New Ford Puma: Mileage Matchup
- Nissan Juke: Offers slightly better fuel economy figures across most variants compared to the Ford Puma, except for the 155 hp Puma, which comes close.
Price Point Punch:
- Europe: The Juke starts at €22,000, while the Puma starts at €21,990. Both offer competitive pricing, with higher trims pushing closer to €30,000.
- UK: The Juke starts at £20,345, while the Puma starts at £19,815. Similar to Europe, the price gap narrows between top-spec trims.
Additional Information:
- The New Nissan Juke offers a hybrid option in some markets, which might be a deciding factor for environmentally conscious buyers.
- The New Ford Puma ST performance variant adds a thrilling dimension to the segment, catering to driving enthusiasts.
- Both cars received high safety ratings from Euro NCAP.
Verdict:
The best choice depends on your priorities. The New Nissan Juke caters to those seeking a bold design, slightly better fuel economy, and potentially a hybrid option. However, its cramped rear space and limited features might be shortcomings. The New Ford Puma shines with its comfortable cabin, innovative storage solutions, and wider range of features. The ST variant adds performance thrills, but fuel economy suffers.
Ultimately, test driving both cars is crucial to experience their individual strengths and weaknesses and choose the one that best fits your lifestyle and driving needs.
